Review guidance

The journal follows a double-blinded peer review process to ensure fairness and objectivity in manuscript evaluation. This means that the identities of both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process.

Authors should prepare their manuscripts accordingly, removing identifying information from the text and supplementary materials. Reviewers are selected based on expertise and are expected to provide constructive, unbiased, and confidential feedback.

The final decision on manuscript acceptance is based on the reviewers’ recommendations and the editorial board’s assessment of the work’s quality, originality, and scientific merit.